132 closed and 188 narrowed: post-2024 BIIP reality and alternatives
Subclass 132 Business Talent was closed to new applications in 2021, and the 2024 reforms cut BIIP places to 1,000. For business owners and investors who can no longer access these pathways, this article maps the alternatives: skilled visas, the Global Talent 858, and state entrepreneur programs.
The Subclass 132 Business Talent visa was the direct permanent residency pathway for high-calibre business owners and investors. Unlike the 188 → 888 provisional-to-permanent model, the 132 granted PR immediately upon grant — no two- or four-year waiting period, no transition application, no second round of state and federal assessment. It was, in effect, the premium business migration product.
The 132 was formally closed to new applications on 1 July 2021 as part of the Morrison government’s BIIP restructure. All applications lodged before that date continue to be processed, but no new 132 applications are accepted. The 2024 reforms further narrowed the BIIP, reducing places from 5,000 to 1,000 and signalling the government’s long-term intention to merge or replace the program.
For business owners and investors who would have been strong 132 candidates five years ago, the pathway to Australian PR now runs through a narrower set of options: the 188 → 888 route (if they meet the higher thresholds), the Global Talent 858 visa (if they qualify in a priority sector), or a skilled migration pathway (if they are under 45 and have an occupation on the CSOL). This article maps what the 132 offered, why it closed, and what has replaced it.
What the 132 offered (pre-2021)
The 132 had two streams:
132A — Significant Business History. For owners or part-owners of a business with:
- Net business and personal assets of at least AUD 1,500,000
- Annual business turnover of at least AUD 3,000,000
- At least 30% ownership (or 10% for listed companies)
- A commitment to establish or participate in a business in Australia
- State or territory nomination
132B — Venture Capital Entrepreneur. For entrepreneurs who had secured at least AUD 1,000,000 in venture capital funding from an Australian Venture Capital Limited Partnership (VCLP) or Early Stage Venture Capital Limited Partnership (ESVCLP) for a promising high-value business idea.
The 132’s defining advantage was immediacy: PR on grant, with no provisional stage. The holder could arrive in Australia as a permanent resident and begin their business activity without the ongoing reporting and threshold obligations that the 188 → 888 pathway imposes.
Why the 132 closed
The Productivity Commission’s 2016 report on the migrant intake concluded that business migration visas deliver lower economic outcomes per migrant than skilled visas. The report found that BIIP migrants were older, earned lower incomes, and paid less tax over their lifetimes than skilled independent or employer-sponsored migrants. The 132 was identified as the lowest-performing business visa subclass in terms of post-migration business activity — many 132 holders did not establish a business of scale in Australia after grant.
The Morrison government’s 2020–2021 BIIP restructure (effective July 2021) closed the 132, raised the 188 thresholds, simplified the 888 transition, and narrowed the program’s focus to higher-value investment and measurable business performance. The 2024 Albanese government reforms continued this trajectory, cutting places further and signalling possible program abolition.
Who the 132’s closure affects most
The closure of the 132 disproportionately affects:
- Business owners aged 45–55 who are too old for the points-tested skilled visas (where the age cut-off is 45 at invitation) and who do not have the capital base for the SIV (188C, requiring AUD 5,000,000 in complying investments)
- Owners of medium-sized businesses with turnover in the AUD 1,000,000–3,000,000 range, who would have qualified under the pre-2021 132 thresholds but who may not meet the post-2024 188A thresholds, particularly the AUD 750,000 turnover requirement and the higher asset thresholds imposed by states like NSW and Victoria
- Entrepreneurs who have not secured institutional venture capital funding but who have built and sold businesses in their home country
Alternatives for former 132 candidates
Skilled migration (189 / 190 / 491)
A business owner who is under 45 and whose occupational background matches an occupation on the CSOL may be better served by a skilled migration application, even if they have never worked as an employee in that occupation. The skills assessment for a generalist manager or business owner can be obtained through an organisation such as the Australian Institute of Management (AIM) for the occupation of “Chief Executive or Managing Director” or through the relevant professional body for the industry in which the business operated.
The points-tested skilled migration pathway is covered in detail at /pathways/189-skilled-independent/ and /pathways/190-state-nominated/.
Global Talent 858
The Subclass 858 Global Talent visa (covered in detail at /pathways/talent-858-overview/) is open to applicants who can demonstrate a record of exceptional achievement in one of 10 priority sectors: Resources, Agri-food and AgTech, Energy, Health Industries, Defence, Advanced Manufacturing and Space, Circular Economy, DigiTech, Infrastructure and Tourism, Financial Services and FinTech, or Education.
A business owner who has built and sold a company in one of these sectors, and who can demonstrate national and international recognition (media coverage, industry awards, patents, or a high salary threshold of AUD 175,000+), may qualify for the 858 without the capital and investment requirements of the BIIP. The 858 grants direct PR, and there is no age limit — a significant advantage over the skilled migration pathway for applicants over 45.
State and territory entrepreneur programs
Some states operate entrepreneur visa programs outside the BIIP framework, often linked to a Subclass 190 or 491 state nomination. These vary by state:
- South Australia operates an entrepreneur stream under its 491 nomination program, requiring a business proposal in a priority sector and evidence of relevant experience
- Tasmania has an entrepreneur pathway under its 190/491 nomination, requiring a business plan and evidence of the business’s viability
- Queensland has a small business owner pathway under its 491 nomination for applicants who have purchased and operated a business in regional Queensland
These programs are not a replacement for the 132, but they offer routes for business owners who would not qualify for the mainstream 188 BIIP.
The investor who cannot meet the 188 thresholds
A high-net-worth individual who wants to invest in Australia but cannot or will not commit to the SIV’s AUD 5,000,000 investment has limited options:
- 188B (Investor): AUD 2,500,000 designated investment + AUD 2,500,000 in assets. Still requires nomination and points test.
- Significant Investor Visa (188C): AUD 5,000,000. No points test, no age limit, minimal residence requirement.
- No direct investment PR pathway below AUD 2,500,000. There is no Australian visa that grants permanent residency solely on the basis of a financial investment below this threshold.
This distinguishes Australia from jurisdictions like Portugal, Greece, and Malta, which offer residency-by-investment at lower thresholds. Australia’s migration policy has consistently prioritised skilled human capital over passive investment.
The future of Australian business migration
The government’s 2025–2026 review of the BIIP is expected to recommend one of three directions:
- Abolition of the standalone BIIP and merger of remaining business migration streams into the skilled migration and Global Talent programs
- Retention with higher thresholds, potentially aligning the SIV minimum with comparable jurisdictions (e.g., New Zealand’s Active Investor Plus at NZD 5,000,000) and raising the 188A/B thresholds further
- Replacement with an innovation visa modelled on the UK Innovator Founder visa, focused on high-growth startup founders with institutional backing
Applicants considering the BIIP as a migration strategy should factor in that the program may not exist in its current form by the time they are eligible to apply for the 888 transition.